Model Harmonisasi Fatwa Blockchain Lintas Yurisdiksi Berbasis Maqashid

Authors

  • Moch. Ainol Kavil Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel
  • Iskandar Ritonga Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel

Keywords:

Fatwa Syariah, Blockchain, Aset Kripto, Harmonisasi Hukum, Maqashid Syariah

Abstract

Perkembangan teknologi blockchain dan aset kripto menghadirkan tantangan signifikan bagi hukum Islam kontemporer, terutama dalam fiqh muamalah. Variasi fatwa dari lembaga seperti DSN-MUI, AAOIFI, dan OIC Fiqh Academy menunjukkan perbedaan metodologis dalam menilai keabsahan kripto dan smart contract, yang berpotensi menghambat integrasi ekonomi syariah lintas negara. Artikel ini mengevaluasi titik temu dan perbedaan utama dalam fatwa global terkait blockchain, serta menawarkan model harmonisasi berbasis maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah. Penelitian menggunakan metode kualitatif deskriptif melalui studi pustaka dan analisis isi dengan pendekatan normatif dan komparatif terhadap dokumen resmi. Hasil menemukan kesepakatan pada pelarangan spekulasi berlebih dan perlunya aset dasar, namun terdapat perbedaan mencolok mengenai pengakuan token sebagai alat tukar dan status smart contract sebagai akad. Artikel mengusulkan kerangka harmonisasi yang mengintegrasikan prinsip syariah universal, mekanisme fatwa transnasional, dan kolaborasi antara pakar fiqh serta ahli teknologi untuk memperkuat kebijakan keuangan Islam yang adaptif terhadap transformasi digital. Temuan ini penting bagi pembuat kebijakan dan praktisi.

References

A. Izzatillayev et al., “The Impact of Blockchain Technology on Financial Services and Digital Transactions,” in ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 2025, pp. 509–514. doi: 10.1145/3726122.3726195.

I. Kalenyuk, O. Kuklin, Y. Panchenko, A. Djakona, and M. Bohun, “Financial Innovations In The Smart City Ecosystem,” Financial and Credit Activity Problems of Theory and Practice, vol. 1, no. 54, pp. 102–113, 2024, doi: 10.55643/fcaptp.1.54.2024.4287.

Chainalysis, “Chainalysis: The 2023 Global Crypto Adoption Index.” Accessed: Oct. 22, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.chainalysis.com/blog/2023-global-crypto-adoption-index/

M. Cherif El Amri, M. Omar Mohammed Ramadhani Mashaka Shabani, E. Amri, and M. M. O, “Banking Regulators’ Views on FinTech Disruption in the Islamic Finance Industry,” Turkish Journal of Islamic Economics, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 191–221, 2025, doi: 10.26414/A573.

A. P. Buana, R. Ramadani, A. Aswari, and Z. Zainuddin, “Polarisation of Islamic Scholars on the Legality of Cryptocurrency Usage as Currency,” Arena Hukum, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 448–464, Aug. 2024, doi: 10.21776/UB.ARENAHUKUM2024.01702.12.

S. I. Ul Mansoor, “Islamic Law in the Age of Blockchain: Exploring Shari’ah Compliant Cryptocurrencies and Digital Assets,” Manchester Journal of Transnational Islamic Law and Practice, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 269–291, 2025.

Suaidi, Z. Mun’im, S. D. Astuti, I. Riyadi, S. Khabibah, and N. Huda, “Harmonisation Between DSN-MUI Fatwas and OJK Regulations: Towards an Innovative and Inclusive Sharia-Compliant Fintech Ecosystem in Indonesia,” Mazahib Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum Islam, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 182–197, 2025, doi: 10.21093/mj.v24i1.10032.

M. Stanley, Qualitative Descriptive: A Very Good Place to Start. 2023. doi: 10.4324/9781003456216-4.

T. Hidayati, M. S. Hidayatullah, P. Komarudin, and A. Atika, “Digitalization of Islamic Finance: Epistemological Study of the National Sharia Board-Indonesian Council of Ulama’s Fatwa,” Al Ahkam, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 255–278, 2023, doi: 10.21580/ahkam.2023.33.2.17324.

Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif Dan R&D, 19th ed. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2013. doi: file:///E:/feb_35efe6a47227d6031a75569c2f3f39d44fe2db43_1652079047.pdf.

Faizi, “Are Cryptocurrencies Ḥaram? A Critical Analysis toward MUI’s Fatwā,” Al Ihkam Jurnal Hukum Dan Pranata Sosial, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 420–442, 2023, doi: 10.19105/al-lhkam.v18i2.8290.

G. Habadi and T. Alsamara, “The Legal Nature of Cryptocurrencies: Analyzing Potential Regulatory Approaches in the United Arab Emirates and the Kingdom Saudi Arabia,” Journal of Ecohumanism, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 2473–2484, 2025, doi: 10.62754/joe.v4i1.6067.

S. F. H. S. A. Rahman, Regulating digital currency: Taming the unruly. 2019.

H. Mohi-ud-Din Qadri, M. I. Bhatti, and M. A. Omar, Role of Islamic economics, business, and finance in a contemporary global context. 2025. doi: 10.4324/9781003168508-2.

N. M. Ibrahim, M. Abu Bakar, S. S. Abdul Rahman, and M. Amrullah Drs Nasrul, “Cryptocurrency as Digital Asset According to the Principles of Usul Al-fiqh: A Critical Analysis by Mohd Daud Bakar,” in 2024 3rd International Conference on Creative Communication and Innovative Technology Iccit 2024, 2024. doi: 10.1109/ICCIT62134.2024.10701114.

F. H. N. Athief, L. Hakim, I. Rosyadi, and A. Rofiqo, “Ending the Debate of Islamic Law Permissibility of Digital Wallet Through the Lens of Fiqh Adaptation,” Manchester Journal of Transnational Islamic Law and Practice, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 194–211, 2023.

S. A. Bin-Nashwan, I. Mohamed, A. Muneeza, M. Sadallah, A. Ya’u, and M. M. Ma’aji, “‘I intend to pay zakat on cryptocurrencies (CCs) but…’: an empirical analysis of CCs holders,” International Journal of Ethics and Systems, 2025, doi: 10.1108/IJOES-11-2024-0376.

S. M. Juhro, F. Syarifuddin, and A. Sakti, “Inclusive Welfare: On the Role of Islamic Social-Public Finance and Monetary Economics,” Inclusive Welfare: On the Role of Islamic Social-Public Finance and Monetary Economics, pp. 1–446, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.1007/978-981-96-0051-9/COVER.

M. N. Alias, M. N. Abdullah, M. S. Kamis, A. J. Afandi, and N. Alias, “SCIENTIFIC APPROACH AS THE BASIS FOR THE FORMATION OF MAQĀṢID AL-SHARĪ‘AH CONCEPT AND PRINCIPLES: A COMPARATIVE STUDY,” Malaysian Journal of Syariah and Law, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 350–363, 2024, doi: 10.33102/mjsl.vol12no2.568.

H. Suhendar, O. S. Mukhlas, and A. A. Hakim, “Legal Politics of the Existence of Fatwa in Islamic Financial Institutions: Evidence from Indonesia,” Jurnal Hukum Islam, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 279–308, 2023, doi: 10.28918/jhi_v21i2_03.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-08

How to Cite

Moch. Ainol Kavil, & Iskandar Ritonga. (2025). Model Harmonisasi Fatwa Blockchain Lintas Yurisdiksi Berbasis Maqashid. Indonesian Journal of Economics Management and Accounting, 2(12), 3087–3092. Retrieved from https://jurnal.intekom.id/index.php/ijema/article/view/1708