Types And Functions of Impoliteness Strategies In Netizens’ Comments On Bonnie Blue’s Tiktok Video Involving The Indonesian Flag: A Culpeper’s Theory Analysis

Meyla Faiza; Diana Anggraeni; Rizky Arif Afandi

Authors

Meyla Faiza Universitas Bangka Belitung
Diana Anggraeni Universitas Bangka Belitung
Rizky Arif Afandi Universitas Bangka Belitung

Keywords:

Ketidaksopanan, Jenis Ketidaksopanan, Fungsi Ketidaksopanan, Culpeper, TikTok

Abstract

Penelitian ini dilakukan untuk menjelaskan secara detail hasil analisis impoliteness pada komentar netizen di video TikTok Bonnie Blue yang melibatkan bendera Indonesia dengan menggunakan teori Culpeper (1996) dan Culpeper (2011). Penelitian ini menggunakan metode deskriptif kualitatif. Berdasarkan hasil analisis terhadap komentar netizen yang telah dipilih dan dianalisis, ditemukan lima jenis impoliteness berdasarkan teori Culpeper (1996), yaitu 10 data Bald on Record Impoliteness, 18 data Positive Impoliteness, 12 data Negative Impoliteness, 7 data Sarcasm or Mock Politeness, dan 5 data Withhold Politeness. Selain itu, ditemukan tiga fungsi impoliteness berdasarkan teori Culpeper (2011), yaitu 21 data Affective Function, 16 data Coercive Function, dan 15 data Entertaining Function. Positive Impoliteness memperoleh jumlah tertinggi dalam analisis jenis impoliteness, sedangkan Affective Function menjadi fungsi yang paling dominan. Sebagian besar komentar netizen menggunakan bahasa ketidaksopanan untuk mengekspresikan face (citra diri), norma sosial, rasa tersinggung, intensionalitas, dan emosi terhadap tindakan Bonnie Blue yang dianggap tidak menghormati simbol nasional Indonesia. Penelitian ini memberikan kontribusi terhadap kajian pragmatik dengan menggabungkan analisis strategi ketidaksopanan dan fungsinya dalam komentar TikTok.

References

J. Culpeper, “Towards an anatomy of impoliteness,” Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 349–367, 1996.

J. Culpeper, Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press, 2011.

M. Dynel, “The landscape of impoliteness research,” Journal of Politeness Research, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 329–354, 2015, doi: 10.1515/pr-2015-0013.

T. N. Fitria, “Value engagement of Tiktok: A review of Tiktok as learning media for language learners in pronunciation skill,” EBONY: Journal of English Language Teaching, Linguistics, and Literature, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 91–102, 2023, doi: 10.37304/ebony.v3i2.9605.

J. Suler, “The online disinhibition effect,” CyberPsychology & Behavior, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 321–326, 2004, doi: 10.1089/1094931041291295.

D. Cahyono, “Impoliteness strategies and power performed by President Donald Trump on Twitter,” Undergraduate thesis, Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang, Malang, Indonesia, 2018.

M. A. Dafiqi, Sukarno, and A. T. Wahyuningsih, “The analysis of impoliteness strategies found in Carnage movie script,” Artikel Ilmiah Mahasiswa, Universitas Jember, 2016.

N. M. Hammod, “Impoliteness strategies in English and Arabic Facebook comments,” International Journal of Linguistics, vol. 9, pp. 97–112, 2017, doi: 10.5296/ijl.v9i5.11895.

M. Mirhosseini, M. Mardanshahi, and H. Dowlatabadi, “Impoliteness strategies based on Culpeper’s model: An analysis of gender differences between two characters in the movie Mother,” Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 221–238, 2017.

N. Walliman, Research Methods: The Basics, 2nd ed. London, U.K.: Routledge, 2017.

J. W. Creswell and J. D. Creswell, Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, 5th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: SAGE Publications, 2018.

D. Bousfield, Impoliteness in Interaction. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2008, doi: 10.1075/pbns.167.

M. Haugh, “Im/politeness, social practice and the participation order,” Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 58, pp. 8–19, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2013.07.003.

X. Gao and Q. Liu, “Dynamics and evaluations of impoliteness: Evidence from short videos of passenger disputes and public comments,” Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 203, pp. 32–45, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2022.11.012.

H. Nassaji, “Qualitative and descriptive research: Data type versus data analysis,” Language Teaching Research, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 129–132, 2015, doi: 10.1177/1362168815572747.