Critical Discourse Analysis of Megawati Soekarno Putri’s Amicus Curiae Letter for MK trial of Presidential Election Disputes

Abstract

This study analyzes Megawati’s Amicus Curiae letter using discourse analysis, focusing on the construction of in-groups and out-groups, representation of social actors, and discursive strategies. The data analysis method involves Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA), focusing on how Megawati’s letter constructs in-group and out-group identities, represents social actors positively or negatively, and employs discursive strategies to legitimize in-group actions while criticizing the out-group. This approach utilizes frameworks from Van Dijk, Van Leeuwen, and Wodak to explore linguistic devices that shape audience perceptions. The findings revealed that the letter constructs the in-group as morally superior and aligned with justice, while the out-group is implied to be responsible for undermining democracy. Discursive strategies, such as moral appeals, historical references, and passive voice, are employed to legitimize in-group actions and subtly criticize the out-group. Additionally, Megawati's motives are highlighted as an effort to assert her political identity, position herself as a defender of democratic values, and enhance her influence in a competitive political landscape.