Publication Ethics

Publication Ethics
(INDOTECH) Indonesian Journal of Education And Computer Science prioritizes publication ethics and will carry out legal reviews if necessary. Each item in publication ethics is based on the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). You can find detailed international guidelines and standards in the Cope of Publication Ethics (COPE).

AUTHOR ETHICS

  1. Reporting Standards: Authors must prepare accurate articles based on research results. The article must contain detailed information and sufficient references. If there is plagiarism above 30% in an article which is done intentionally, this is unethical behavior and must be revised by the author or we will reject the article.
  2. Originality and Plagiarism: Writers are required to ensure that their written work is not plagiarized and provide clear information with each quotation. Authors are PROHIBITED from publishing the same article in different journals. If these violations are found, we will reject the article.
  3. Acknowledgment of Sources: Authors must cite publications that have been used as the basis for their scientific work.
  4. Authorship of the Paper: Written work should be limited to researchers who have made significant contributions to the conception, design, implementation, or interpretation of the research being reported. All researchers who have made significant contributions must be listed as co-authors. Researchers who participate in substantive aspects of a research must be recognized or registered as contributors. The primary author must ensure that co-authors are eligible to be included on the list of researchers and all authors must see and approve the final version of the manuscript to be published.
  5. Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest : Each author must disclose in their manuscript any substantive financial or interests that might be construed to influence the outcome of a manuscript.
  6. Fundamental errors in published works: If the author finds an error in a published manuscript, the author must report this to the journal editor or publisher and work with the editor to retract or correct the manuscript.

EDITOR

  1. Publication decisions: The editors will be responsible for deciding on articles that have been accepted by the editorial board for publication. Editors can refer to the policies of the journal's editorial board and are limited by applicable legal provisions regarding defamation, copyright infringement and plagiarism. Editors may also consult with other editors or reviewers in making decisions.
  2. Fair Play:
    The editor may at any time evaluate the contents of the manuscript without regard to the race, gender, sexual orientation, religion, ethnicity, nationality, or political philosophy of the author.
  3. Confidentiality : The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about the submitted manuscript to any party other than the author, reviewers, potential reviewers, editorial advisor and publisher.
  4. Disclosure and conflicts of interest: Material in manuscripts submitted and not published in the journal may not be used in the editor's research, without written approval from the author.

REVIEWERS

  1. Contribution to Editorial Decisions : Reviewers assist the editor in making editorial decisions and through editorial communication with the author, can help the author improve the manuscript. Reviewers are also expected to provide suggestions for improvements to the review results.
  2. Promptness : Any reviewer who feels they are not qualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or to perform an expedited review of the manuscript should notify the editor and not be involved in the review process. Invited reviewers must also confirm their willingness/unwillingness to review the article.
  3. Confidentiality: Every manuscript received for review must be treated as a confidential document. These manuscripts must not be displayed or discussed with other parties unless permission is obtained from the editor.
  4. Standards of Objectivity: Boxing must be done objectively. The author is not permitted to criticize personally. Reviewers must provide clear information about the results of the review along with supporting arguments.
  5. Acknowledgment of Sources: Reviewers must identify relevant published papers that have not been cited by the author. Statements about previously reported observations, derivations or arguments should be accompanied by relevant citations. Reviewers must also coordinate with the editor regarding substantial similarities between the manuscript under consideration and other articles that have been published to the knowledge of the editor and reviewer.
  6. Disclosure and Conflict of Interest: Information or ideas obtained from review partners must be kept confidential and not used for personal gain. Reviewers are not permitted to consider a manuscript due to a conflict of interest, collaboration, or other interests with the author, company, or related institution

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License